Is Terrorism Justified - 2000 Words

Is Terrorism Justified ? Is terrorism ever justifiable ? The answer is no, terrorism is never justifiable. I will argue that terrorism is not justifiable because it does not contribute to a goal of a more peaceful society. Terrorism contributes to conflict, no matter what reason is used to legitimize it. But in order to argue that terrorism is unjustifiable I must first decide on a definition of terrorism. This definition encompasses all the acts that we would determine as terrorism. This includes acts that one side would label as â€Å"freedom fighting† and another would label as terrorism. Terrorism is violence set against non-combatants in order to intimidate a side to submit to a particular goal. For something to be justifiable, it†¦show more content†¦Military bases are attacked on a regular basis. But in the above case the terrorist specifically attacked the mess hall at a time where they were most venerable. This is different from an attack which would aim at subduing the militar y base. The terrorist could have chosen to blow up the arms reserve or attack the base directly to render it unable to attack. But that was not the case. In this example one becomes a terrorist by using violence to attack when least expect with the intention of weakening moral. Knowing that one can be attacked even within a secured military base counts as intimidation. With this definition, terrorism can be applied to an action whether the victim is right or wrong. Now the question is whether terrorism is justified. Before arguing whether terrorism is justified or not, we must decide what we mean by justified. The etymology ties it to the word justice. And while the exact meaning of the word justice has been debated on for centuries, it is safe to say that it includes what is morally right. So in order to decide if terrorism is justified we must agree that terrorism is morally right. Unfortunately terrorism is morally wrong; therefore it can never be justified. From a utilitarian s tandpoint, terrorism does not contribute to achieving maximum happiness. If no one committed terrorist acts than there is a greater chance for society to achieve maximum happiness. A society without terrorism would have an easier time having more peopleShow MoreRelatedThe Act Of Terrorism Is Justified1514 Words   |  7 Pages Introduction For some time, terrorism has been a tactic used in this world often by many individuals and groups. By definition, the act of terrorism is intended to intimidate a civilian population, to influence the policy of a government through intimidation or coercion, in order to appease a political dilemma (N/A, What We Investigate, n.d.). To accomplish an act of terrorism, man power, supplies, and payment, and more are required. But how is it possible generate, store, and transfer a vast amountRead MoreCan Terrorism Ever Be Justified1677 Words   |  7 PagesCan terrorism ever be justified? Since the turn of the century, the postmodern world has seen increasing levels of political, cultural, military and socio-economic tumult, much of this due to a series of terrorist attacks on American soil and the resultant waging of Washington ’s â€Å"War on Terror†. Consequently, the nature of terrorism has come under intense media focus and is subject to immense debate, especially on its justification. Before engaging in such a debate one must first identify terrorismRead MoreTerrorism Has Been Used For Centuries As A Weapon Of Change1074 Words   |  5 PagesTerrorism has been used for centuries as a weapon of change. Terrorism used to force change even altered the English language, the creation of the word assassin because of the Hashhashin’s in the 11th century and the Roman’s use of decimation changing the meaning from killing one in ten to massacring all involved. Much of early terrorism was based on nationalist or ethnic groups, which had exhaus ted all other options while reaching for political freedom and therefore resorted to violence. The mostRead MoreTerrorism Is Morally Unjustifiable By Stephen Nathanson1477 Words   |  6 PagesAs paradoxical as it may seem (to most), it proves difficult to condemn terrorism and have a consistent, non-hypocritical way to judge it. Most definitions of terrorism lack the applicability of all instances of terrorism, there seems to be borderline exceptions which fall within the gray area of such definitions. Stephen Nathanson, in an effort to establish what makes terrorism wrong, bases one of his main arguments on that terrorists are thought to be dreadful because they intentionally seek innocentRead MoreAnalysis Of C. Christine Fair And Bryan Shepherd s Research Note1567 Words   |  7 Pagesupon demand for terrorism (also known as support) to address empirical lacunae in exploring detailed demographic and psychographic variables among fourteen countries with predominantly Muslim pop ulations or with large Muslim minorities in 2002. Whereas many of previous research focused upon the supply of terrorist work force and the shared characteristics of terrorists, the present research note represents a quantitative effort to understand the segments of the demand for terrorism. The research noteRead MoreTerrorism : Killing Innocents For Noble Causes Essay1421 Words   |  6 PagesTerrorism: Killing Innocents for Noble Causes Can you remember where you were on the fatal day of September 11, 2001? When people think of terrorism, the first thought is usually about that dreadful day. Terrorism is defined as, â€Å"Premeditated and unlawful acts in which groups or agents of some principal engage in a threatened or actual use of force against human or property targets† (p. G-23). Terrorists often uses violence or threat to advance their agenda or goal. Terrorism is very widespreadRead MoreTerrorism: Is It Mala in Se or Mala Prohibita Essay688 Words   |  3 Pagesbetween legally proscribed offenses and morally proscribed offenses. Legally proscribed offenses are offenses that are wrong simply because there a formal rule keeps someone from doing them. The morally proscribed offenses are offenses that cannot be justified in a sophisticated society. For example, legally proscribed offenses are offenses such as prostitution, and gambling and morally proscribed offenses are thing like premeditated murder a nd forcible rape. The State of Washington vs. Thaddius X. AndersonRead MoreMass Surveillance Is Not A Justified Method Of Governmental Intelligence Gathering1664 Words   |  7 PagesResolution: Mass surveillance is not a justified method of governmental intelligence gathering. We define the term â€Å"surveillance†, as the act of carefully watching someone or something especially in order to prevent or detect a crime, as does Merriam - Webster’s dictionary. We will have three main contentions. First: anti-terrorism, second: cost-effective, and third: it does not affect people. Contention One: Anti-Terrorism. Mass surveillance prevents terrorism in many ways. First, Mass surveillanceRead MoreAmericas Contribution to Terrorist Attacks1006 Words   |  5 PagesCan acts of terrorist violence be morally justified? To any of us who witnessed the attacks of 9/11, or indeed any terrorist attack in recent history, this may seem an absurd question. How, we ask, could anyone justify the deaths of over 3,000 innocent civilians? While these acts are morally reprehensible, so too are the acts of the west that give rise to Islamic terrorism and the west’s military responses to terrorist acts. According to Honderich, every human being is entitled to a decent lifespanRead MoreWhat Is Terrorism, Is It Wrong, And Could It Ever Be Morally Permissible?1530 Words   |  7 PagesIn Alison M. Jaggar’s paper â€Å"What is Terrorism, Why is it Wrong, and Could it Ever be Morally Permissible?†, she takes the topic of terrorism and tries to bring up information about it in a way to where terrorism can be discussed fairly and examined critically. Terrorism has been defined differently by various people, but many have voiced their concerns about this type of violence. Jaggar tried to develop an account (i.e., in-depth definition) of terrorism that would be consistent, precise, and